Individualized Text Messages about Public Services Fail to Sway Voters: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Ugandan Elections


Journal article


Ryan S. Jablonski, Mark T. Buntaine, D. Nielson, Paula M. Pickering
Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2021

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Jablonski, R. S., Buntaine, M. T., Nielson, D., & Pickering, P. M. (2021). Individualized Text Messages about Public Services Fail to Sway Voters: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Ugandan Elections. Journal of Experimental Political Science.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Jablonski, Ryan S., Mark T. Buntaine, D. Nielson, and Paula M. Pickering. “Individualized Text Messages about Public Services Fail to Sway Voters: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Ugandan Elections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science (2021).


MLA   Click to copy
Jablonski, Ryan S., et al. “Individualized Text Messages about Public Services Fail to Sway Voters: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Ugandan Elections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2021.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{ryan2021a,
  title = {Individualized Text Messages about Public Services Fail to Sway Voters: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Ugandan Elections},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Journal of Experimental Political Science},
  author = {Jablonski, Ryan S. and Buntaine, Mark T. and Nielson, D. and Pickering, Paula M.}
}

Abstract

Abstract Mobile communication technologies can provide citizens access to information that is tailored to their specific circumstances. Such technologies may therefore increase citizens’ ability to vote in line with their interests and hold politicians accountable. In a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Uganda (n = 16,083), we investigated whether citizens who receive private, timely, and individualized text messages by mobile phone about public services in their community punished or rewarded incumbents in local elections in line with the information. Respondents claimed to find the messages valuable and there is evidence that they briefly updated their beliefs based on the messages; however, the treatment did not cause increased votes for incumbents where public services were better than expected nor decreased votes where public services were worse than anticipated. The considerable knowledge gaps among citizens identified in this study indicate potential for communication technologies to effectively share civic information. Yet the findings imply that when the attribution of public service outcomes is difficult, even individualized information is unlikely to affect voting behavior.